Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz vs Chanel Janssen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Mar at 10:38 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Alhussein Abdel Aziz vs C. Janssen

EGY
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Aziz 1 - 0 Janssen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz winning 2 and Chanel Janssen winning 0. The last match between Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz and Chanel Janssen was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aziz | 1 |
| Janssen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(03-19-25)
L. A. A. Aziz vs C. Janssen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.36% (313-181) | Career Total W/L | 36.24% (79-139) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. A. A. Aziz vs C. Janssen Match Preview:
The battle of the serves is gearing up to be quite the spectacle! In the past six months, Janssen has been hustling and bustling on their second serve, winning 40.98% of points, while Aziz has thrown in a few more double faults but still managed 38.51%. This game of numbers might just be the crystal ball we need to predict the winner of this match-up.
Both players have been diligently returning serves, but it appears Janssen has been a bit more generous, pocketing 54.03% of their opponents' second serve points, compared to Aziz's 51.83%. When it comes to first serve return points, however, Aziz swoops in like a hawk, grabbing 36.69% over Janssen's 30.53%. It's like a fierce game of Pokémon cards, and in this scenario, Aziz's Charizard seems slightly stronger!
Now, delving into the high-stakes world of breakpoint survival, Janssen has heroically saved 47.46% of breakpoints, though Aziz trumps slightly with a saving grace at 49.26%. This dance on the edge could swing the match either way, drawing a fine line between silver service and toast crumbs.
Last year's scoreboard has Janssen at a moderate 36.84% match win rate, which, let's just say, rhymes with Belgian chocolate – a treat nonetheless! On the other hand, Aziz seems to be somewhere in a winning galaxy, savoring a 65.22% win rate that looks like a confident cat in a playful mouse hunt.
As for specific surfaces, Janssen seems to have developed a particular affinity for Hard courts, boasting a proud 35% win record, despite their mishap on I.hard with a modest 31%. Aziz has meanwhile been ballroom dancing across the indoor hard with a smashing 67% win record. Clay surfaces appear to bring out the grump in Aziz, recording a less enthusiastic 59% win rate.
Match level matters, and so far, Janssen's dreams have mostly been chased at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, pulling off a winsome 46.15%. Aziz, with a higher 68.75% win rate in the same sphere, seems most at ease, like a duck paddling elegantly across the pond.
Facing formidable foes, Janssen has tackled adversaries with an average rank of 253.71, while Aziz cruises in the less stormy waters dodging rank 402.3 warriors, each perhaps bringing a different flavor of challenge to the match court.
If it comes to a nail-biting deciding set, Janssen and Aziz both have a knack for turning the tables. Janssen has won 50% of decisive sets in the past year, whereas Aziz, ever so slightly sharp, clinches it 53% of the time. Whoever has the sherbet lemon of luck here only time will tell!
When an opportunity arises, Janssen's breakpoint conversion prowess shines at 54.55%, proving to be sharper than Aziz's 41.97%. These quicksilver moments could make for some tantalizing in-match betting banter!
In summation, considering all these intriguing stats that zip and zoom like a well-struck forehand, my crystal tennis ball suggests Aziz is likely to serve up the victory based on this statistical chessboard. May the best player win, while we all munch on scones and strawberries! 🍓
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz vs Chanel Janssen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. A. A. Aziz vs C. Janssen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:0:13 | Average Match Time | 2:0:13 |
| 69% (45/65) | 1st Serve % | 61% (47/77) |
| 67% (30/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (28/47) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 42% (32/77) | Return Points Win % | 34% (22/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. A. A. Aziz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-7(2) 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
C. Janssen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 12-10 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-5 6-0 | ||

L. A. A. Aziz vs C. Janssen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.36% (313/181) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.24% (79/139) |
| 60.73% (685/443) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.14% (185/300) |
| 54.51% (5552/4633) | Games Win/Loss | 45.08% (2048/2495) |
| 65.18% (219/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 37.37% (37/62) |
| 59.35% (92/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.69% (34/64) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 495 | Aces Total | 99 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1542 | Total Double Faults | 512 |
| 1:40:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 489.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 270.54 |
| 64% (19458/30375) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3699/6163) |
| 60% (11626/19458) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (2045/3699) |
| 45% (4926/10917) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (974/2464) |
| 51% (2235/4412) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (324/687) |
| 49% (15439/31276) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2656/6123) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Challenger W/L | 21.62% (8/29) |
| 65.50% (300/158) | Futures W/L | 39.23% (71/110) |
| 63% (303/479) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (78/217) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (53/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
| 56% (83/148) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (22/50) |
| 91% (288/262) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (81/64) |
| 9% (288/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (81/17) |
| 24% (203/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (137/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
